|
Post by PeterL on Sept 12, 2013 22:43:49 GMT
Would hundreds of British solders lives been needlessly lost in Iraq and Afghanistan to say nothing of those maimed for life And thousands of immigrants allowed to flood into this country
I personally find it hard to think of anyone else who would have done as much harm to this country than he has
|
|
|
Post by maggie on Sept 13, 2013 15:47:15 GMT
And Dr David Kelly would still be alive perhaps?
|
|
|
Post by PeterL on Sept 15, 2013 8:34:02 GMT
ithink the chances of David Kelly still being a live would have been far greater if Blair had never been Prime Minister
|
|
beth
Full Member
Posts: 102
|
Post by beth on Oct 13, 2013 4:35:42 GMT
Maybe there wouldn't have been an Iraq war if Bush hadn't been able to find a willing accomplice. I doubt it would have worked out that way, but it's a nice thought.
|
|
|
Post by PeterL on Oct 13, 2013 9:18:42 GMT
George Bush Tells Blair to Jump Blair asks how high ?
|
|
|
Post by toby on Dec 23, 2013 12:30:39 GMT
There would have been No Iraq war, Bush would not take the USA to war on his own.
|
|
|
Post by Ned Long on Jan 2, 2014 11:51:47 GMT
And on the subject of Doctor Kelly, there STILL has not been a coroners inquest into his suspicious death, although that is a basic requirement of English law. This is very wrong, and yet any criticism from the medical profession, or anyone else for that matter, is simply ignored or brushed aside. How DO they get away with it, or, more pertinently, why do we allow them to get away with it?
|
|
|
Post by toby on Jun 8, 2014 18:34:07 GMT
The first responders to find poor Dr. Kelly noticed there was No Blood on the ground and they told this to the world yest we never heard anything more about this and it's almost as if somebody told them to keep quiet. Of course nobody believes the theory that Dr.Kelly was killed elsewhere and his body dumped.
|
|
beth
Full Member
Posts: 102
|
Post by beth on Aug 20, 2014 17:38:11 GMT
Of course this is assuming whoever was in office was a better man than Blair. Who would have been worse?
|
|
|
Post by markindurham on Aug 25, 2014 7:27:40 GMT
Of course this is assuming whoever was in office was a better man than Blair. Who would have been worse?Gordon Brown - as subsequently proven...
|
|
beth
Full Member
Posts: 102
|
Post by beth on Aug 27, 2014 1:43:53 GMT
Worse? I'm shocked!
Oh well, you know better than I, Mark.
|
|
|
Post by PeterL on Aug 27, 2014 8:28:57 GMT
Of course this is assuming whoever was in office was a better man than Blair. Who would have been worse?Gordon Brown - as subsequently proven... Overall I think Gordon Brown was worse than Tony Blair but would he have involved us in Iraq?
|
|
|
Post by markindurham on Aug 31, 2014 15:18:00 GMT
Gordon Brown - as subsequently proven... Overall I think Gordon Brown was worse than Tony Blair but would he have involved us in Iraq? Good question, Peter. He may well have done; he was deluded enough to claim that he'd "saved the world" after the 2008 financial meltdown, don't forget.
|
|
|
Post by PeterL on Sept 1, 2014 22:04:40 GMT
Overall I think Gordon Brown was worse than Tony Blair but would he have involved us in Iraq? Good question, Peter. He may well have done; he was deluded enough to claim that he'd "saved the world" after the 2008 financial meltdown, don't forget. there are few people worse than someone who is deluded is deluded
|
|